Pruveon

EU AI Act compliance that holds up under scrutiny.

Pruveon turns EU AI Act obligations into a structured 11-step compliance journey — classification, documentation, risk management, evidence, and conformity readiness. Purpose-built for the regulation.

Where current approaches break down

Documentation scattered across slides, inboxes, and checklists is not compliance.

Generic GRC platforms have started adding AI Act modules, but they remain broad and shallow — built around generic checklists rather than the specific structure of the regulation. Pruveon is built around the regulation itself.

Obligations span legal, product, engineering, and leadership, with no shared system to coordinate them

When auditors, regulators, or customers request evidence, teams reconstruct it from inboxes and memory under time pressure

Generic compliance tooling produces documentation that appears complete but does not hold up to a substantive audit

Harmonised standards and regulatory guidance continue to evolve, and existing documentation goes out of date without anyone noticing

Why now

The regulation is in force. The infrastructure to comply with it is not yet standard.

The EU AI Act is not a future obligation. Prohibitions on unacceptable-risk AI have applied since February 2025. GPAI model obligations since August 2025. The high-risk AI rules — which affect the widest range of providers and deployers — apply from August 2026.

Boards, investors, customers, and procurement teams are already asking what readiness looks like, and most companies have not started. Pruveon is built specifically for this regulation, rather than adapted from an adjacent compliance framework, and is designed to give those teams a defensible answer.

How Pruveon works

Generate. Attest. Prove.

Pruveon organises the Act's obligations into an 11-step workflow, then makes each step fast to complete and straightforward to audit. Three modes, one system, built specifically for the regulation.

Compliance health score

A continuous view of where each AI system stands.

Every AI system in Pruveon carries a live compliance health score that separates documentation completeness from operational readiness. Two distinct measures, so progress on paper is never confused with progress in practice.

Documentation72%
Compliance readiness45%

Generate

Produce the documentation the regulation requires.

Annex IV technical documentation, Instructions for Use, Quality Management System, Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment, and EU Declaration of Conformity — structured, versioned, and ready for regulator review.

Attest

Operationalise the controls the regulation requires, and record that they were performed.

Risk management, data governance, human oversight, incident management, and conformity assessment readiness — each attested by an accountable owner, with evidence that reflects what teams actually do rather than what was written down.

Prove

Capture and retain the evidence the regulation expects from your AI systems.

Logging specifications, accuracy and robustness evidence, and immutable retention requirements — defined precisely enough for engineering teams to implement and for auditors to verify.

What Pruveon covers

The obligations that create the most operational friction, handled in one system.

Book a call

AI system classification mapped to the Act's exact risk-tier structure

Annex IV technical documentation across all nine sections, versioned and timestamped

Risk management maintained across the full system lifecycle, rather than captured once and abandoned

Human oversight, data governance, and incident management documented and attested by accountable owners

Standards monitoring — new harmonised standards from CEN-CLC/JTC 21 are mapped to your existing documentation as they are published

Regulatory timeline

Key dates already in motion.

Feb 2025

Unacceptable-risk AI prohibited

Prohibitions on AI practices posing unacceptable risk became enforceable across the EU.

Aug 2025

GPAI obligations applied

Obligations on general-purpose AI models and the associated governance requirements took effect.

Enforcement deadline

Aug 2026

High-risk AI rules in force

Full enforcement of obligations on providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems — the deadline shaping most current compliance programmes.

Who it is for

Providers, deployers, and the partners advising them.

Providers

Companies building AI systems carry the heaviest obligations under the Act, from Annex IV technical documentation through EU database registration. Pruveon serves as the system of record from initial classification through post-market monitoring.

Head of LegalGeneral CounselChief Compliance Officer

Deployers

Companies putting third-party AI into service carry lighter but binding obligations: human oversight, logging, Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment, and registration. Pruveon structures the process and retains the evidence required when scrutiny arrives.

Chief Risk OfficerHead of ProcurementDPO

Partners

Law firms and compliance consultancies advising multiple clients use the Partner tier: a single account with isolated client workspaces, white-labelled document output, and a portfolio-level compliance view.

Regulatory law firmsCompliance consultancies

Why infrastructure matters

Compliance reconstructed under pressure costs significantly more than compliance built in advance.

Customer due diligence, board reviews, investor questions, procurement assessments, and regulatory enquiries all ask the same thing in different language: show what was decided, why, and what evidence supports it.

Pruveon is designed to keep that answer available continuously, rather than assembled under time pressure once the question has already been asked.

See the product

Book a call to walk through the compliance workflow with our team.

Stay informed

EU AI Act updates, in your inbox.

Regulatory developments, harmonised standards published under Art. 40, and Pruveon product updates — written for teams building or deploying AI in the EU.

Work email

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.